Take "global warming" as an example of Conservapedia’s "content you can trust":
On February 2, 2007, an internatonal panel of hundreds of scientists and representatives of 113 governments issued a report concluding:
- "The observed widespread warming of the atmosphere and ocean, together with ice-mass loss, support the conclusion that it is extremely unlikely that global climate change of the past 50 years can be explained without external forcing, and very likely that is not due to known natural causes alone."
It should be noted that these scientists are motivated by a need for grant money in their field of climatology. Therefore, their work can not be considered unbiased, though no more than any scientist in any other field .. Also, these scientists are mostly liberal athiests, untroubled by the hubris that man can destroy the Earth which God gave him.
Is this hilarious, dangerous, or just plain sad?